That view was always simplistic, given the region's vastly complex religious and ethnic politics. We had two threats to combat, and eliminating one inevitably meant confronting the other in due course. Unfortunately, under both Bush and Obama, we did not deal adequately with Iran's nuclear-weapons programme and its support for terrorism.
That Iran is now more of a danger stems far more from that western failure than from overthrowing Saddam. Iran has already substantially increased its meddling inside Iraq, both influencing the regime of Nouri al-Maliki and enhancing the capabilities of terrorist thugs like Muqtada al-Sadr. It is challenging its Arab neighbours across the Gulf, threatening to close the Straits of Hormuz and target the US bases and facilities there as well as Nato forces in Turkey.
Tehran is obviously willing to shed considerable Syrian blood to keep Assad's dictatorship in power, and Hezbollah effectively in control in Lebanon. And Iran moves inexorably closer to its long-sought objective of nuclear weapons deliverable by intercontinental ballistic missiles.
The withdrawal of US forces from Iraq will unquestionably increase Iran's relative regional power. America's Arab allies in the Gulf Co-operation Council are extraordinarily nervous about Washington's staying power, especially under the weak, indecisive and inattentive Obama presidency. Containing and ultimately overthrowing the regimes in Iran and Syria could have been substantially advanced during the US military presence in Iraq, and will clearly be much more difficult after our withdrawal.
Those who say they want Iran contained should have supported a substantial, long-term US military presence in Iraq. In short, our withdrawal from Iraq presages a world where Obama-style policies of American decline and turning inward have prevailed. In-depth analysis delivered weekly - Subscribe to our newsletter, featuring our editors' top picks from the past week.
Sign in Subscribe. Subscribe Login Sign up. Foreign Policy. Trending U.
The withdrawal of U.S. military forces from Iraq began in December with the end of the 1 Background. Polling; U.S. Presidential election; Congressional proposals and acts; McGovern-Polk proposal; ANSWER, NION, UFPJ. Iraq is the name of the state that currently partially encompasses the territory of the civilization The history of this area has witnessed some of the world's earliest writing, literature, sciences, mathematics, laws .. After the end of the Gulf War and after the Iraqi withdrawal from Kuwait, the sanctions were linked to removal of.
In This Review. The U.
Army in the Iraq War. Rayburn and Frank K. On 3 April , the Council adopted resolution , setting detailed conditions for a formal ceasefire to end the conflict and establishing the machinery for ensuring implementation of those conditions.
By resolution the Council established, among other things, a demilitarized zone DMZ along the boundary between Iraq and Kuwait, to be monitored by a United Nations observer unit, and requested the Secretary-General to submit a plan for the unit's immediate deployment. It decided further that the modalities for the Mission should be reviewed every six months, but without requiring in each case a formal decision for its extension. The Council's formal decision would be required only for UNIKOM's termination, thus ensuring the indefinite duration of the Mission, its termination being subject to the concurrence of all the permanent members of the Council.
By 6 May, the Mission was fully deployed.
UNIKOM then monitored the withdrawal of the armed forces that were still deployed in its assigned zone. These troops were withdrawn by the end of June The Khawr 'Abd Allah waterway is about 40 kilometres 25 miles long.
The DMZ, which is about kilometres miles long, extends 10 kilometres 6 miles into Iraq and 5 kilometres 3 miles into Kuwait. Except for the oilfields and two towns - Umm Qasr, which became Iraq's only outlet to the sea, and Safwan - the zone is barren and almost uninhabited. According to the original mandate, UNIKOM did not have the authority or the capacity to take physical action to prevent the entry of military personnel or equipment into the DMZ. Responsibility for the maintenance of law and order in the DMZ rests with the Governments of Iraq and Kuwait which maintain police posts in their respective parts of the zone.
Police are allowed only side arms.
UNIKOM mandate expanded On 5 February , following a series of incidents on the newly demarcated boundary between Iraq and Kuwait involving Iraqi intrusions into the Kuwaiti side of the DMZ and unauthorized retrieval of Iraqi property from Kuwaiti territory, the Security Council, by its resolution , expanded the tasks of UNIKOM to include the capacity to take physical action to prevent or redress: a small-scale violations of the DMZ; b violations of the boundary between Iraq and Kuwait, for example by civilians or police; and c problems that might arise from the presence of Iraqi installations and Iraqi citizens and their assets in the DMZ on the Kuwaiti side of the newly demarcated boundary.
The Council increased the authorized strength of the mission to 3, three mechanized infantry battalions including support elements and requested the Secretary-General to execute a phased deployment of the additional elements.
On 2 April , the Secretary-General informed the Security Council of his intention, in the first phase, to retain the military observers and to reinforce them by one mechanized infantry battalion. The Council concurred with this recommendation. An advance team arrived in the mission area in mid-November , followed by the remainder of the battalion during the month of December and early January It was now based on a combination of patrol and observation bases, observation points, ground and air patrols, vehicle check-points, roadblocks, a force mobile reserve, investigation teams and liaison with the parties at all levels.
In addition, following a lengthy period of preparation, the Khawr 'Abd Allah Waterway Monitoring project commenced operation on 15 February